Knowing what each operation involves, who it’s for, and how the options compare helps you make a confident, well-informed decision about your hip or knee.

Most hip and knee arthritis is managed first without an operation: activity modification, physical therapy, weight management, anti-inflammatory medication, and injections. Joint replacement enters the conversation when those measures no longer provide enough relief to do the things you care about: walking without planning around pain, sleeping through the night, keeping up with family.

The sections below explain each procedure clearly: what it involves, when it’s considered, and how the options differ. Every recommendation is individualized based on your symptoms, examination, and imaging. There is no one-size-fits-all operation.

What it is

The hip is a ball-and-socket joint. When the smooth cartilage lining the joint wears away, most often from osteoarthritis, the common “wear-and-tear” form of arthritis, bone begins to rub on bone, causing pain, stiffness, and a shrinking radius of activity. A hip replacement removes the worn ball and socket and replaces them with implants sized and positioned to recreate your specific anatomy.

Hip replacement has been called “the operation of the century”: for most patients it means substantial pain relief and a return to walking, cycling, golf, travel, and daily life without thinking about the hip.

Dr. Harris plans the operation from your own imaging and routinely uses robotic assistance or computer navigation to help position the implants, fitting the socket to your anatomy.

When it’s considered

  • Osteoarthritis (wear-and-tear arthritis), by far the most common reason
  • Avascular necrosis, loss of blood supply to the ball of the hip
  • Hip dysplasia, a shallow socket that wears out early, often in younger patients
  • Inflammatory arthritis, such as rheumatoid arthritis
  • Certain hip fractures

Two ways to reach the joint

There are two main surgical approaches to the hip. Both are well-established approaches with similar results in most studies, and Dr. Harris performs both. Which one suits a given patient depends on anatomy, imaging, and health history rather than a single fixed philosophy.

Anterior Approach

From the front of the hip · Dr. Harris’s preferred approach

This is the approach Dr. Harris prefers for most hip replacements. It reaches the hip by working between the muscles rather than cutting through them, which for many patients can mean less discomfort early on and a quicker return to walking. Some studies have found lower dislocation rates with the anterior approach than with a traditional posterior approach, while others have found them similar. When your anatomy is a good fit, he can perform it through a “bikini” incision, a shorter cut that follows the natural crease of the skin, leaving a lower, more discreet scar.

STAR Approach

A modern, tissue-sparing approach from the back of the hip

Dr. Harris performs the STAR approach (Superior Transverse Anatomic Reconstruction), an updated version of the traditional approach from the back of the hip. It gives a clear, complete view of the joint while preserving the muscles and tendons that help keep the hip steady, structures that older techniques often divided.

What it is

Despite the name, a knee replacement is closer to a resurfacing. The worn cartilage and a thin layer of bone are removed from the ends of the thigh bone and shin bone, then capped with smooth metal and plastic surfaces, much like a dentist crowns a damaged tooth. Your own muscles and most ligaments remain, which is why rehabilitation is so central to a good result.

It’s considered when arthritis pain limits daily life despite non-surgical treatment, most often from osteoarthritis (the everyday “wear-and-tear” arthritis), but also inflammatory arthritis or arthritis that develops years after a knee injury.

Most knee replacements are done through a standard approach, but for some patients another option is a subvastus (muscle-sparing) technique that slips beneath the quadriceps muscle instead of cutting through the tendon. Whether it fits depends on your anatomy, and Dr. Harris will discuss it when it’s appropriate.

What to expect

Most patients are up and walking the day of surgery, though recovery varies from person to person. Dr. Harris uses current multimodal techniques to manage pain and swelling afterward, keeping early recovery as comfortable as possible. Physical therapy is also an important part of the recovery process for most patients, with most of the improvement coming in the first three months.

For many knees, Dr. Harris uses robotic assistance and computer navigation to help fine-tune implant position and soft-tissue balance. Modern implants are very durable, with large registry studies showing most knee replacements still in place 25 years after surgery, and many lasting 30 years or more.

Four anatomical drawings of the same knee side by side. First a normal knee with cartilage on the groove at the front of the femur and on both sides of the joint between the femur and the tibia. Second a patellofemoral joint replacement, with a metal surface on the groove at the front of the femur only. Third a partial knee replacement, with a metal surface on one side of the joint between the femur and the tibia and a plastic bearing beneath it. Fourth a total knee replacement, with the end of the femur and the top of the tibia both resurfaced and a plastic bearing between them.

One knee, then the three operations. How much of the joint is resurfaced follows how much of it is worn.

  • Normal knee
    Femur and tibia: Cartilage covers the groove at the front of the femur and both sides of the joint between the femur and the tibia. What stays: Both menisci and both cruciate ligaments.
  • Patellofemoral joint replacement
    Resurfaced: The groove at the front of the femur. What stays: The inner and outer compartments keep their own cartilage, along with the menisci and both cruciate ligaments.
  • Partial knee replacement
    Resurfaced: One side of the joint between the femur and the tibia, the inner side here, with a plastic bearing between the two. What stays: The other compartments, both cruciate ligaments, and the meniscus on the side that was left alone.
  • Total knee replacement
    Resurfaced: The end of the femur and the top of the tibia, with a plastic bearing between them. Removed: Both menisci and the anterior cruciate ligament.

Total Knee Replacement

For arthritis throughout the knee

All three compartments of the knee are resurfaced. This is the most common knee replacement and the right choice when wear involves most of the joint. It offers lasting pain relief for most patients, though some have ongoing pain or stiffness.

Partial Knee Replacement

For wear limited to one part of the knee

Only the damaged part of the knee is resurfaced; healthy cartilage and all the ligaments are preserved. Depending on where the wear is, this may be a medial partial knee replacement (inner side), a lateral partial knee replacement (outer side), or a patellofemoral joint replacement (behind the kneecap). In carefully selected knees, a partial knee replacement can feel more natural and recover faster, but is more likely than a total knee replacement to need further surgery later. More on partial knee replacement.

03 · Revision

Revision Hip & Knee Replacement

Full details: revision hip & knee replacement →

Revision joint replacement surgery is some of the most technically demanding work in hip and knee surgery, and Dr. Harris’s fellowship training included complex revision surgery.

Revision surgery removes some or all of an existing implant and rebuilds the joint, often with specialized components designed for bone that has changed since the first operation. Part of Dr. Harris’s research looks at why implants fail.

The first task is understanding exactly why a joint replacement is failing, which is as important as the operation itself and shapes everything that follows. With that diagnosis in hand, Dr. Harris evaluates and treats hip and knee replacements that have failed, including implants placed by other surgeons.

Reasons a joint replacement might need revision

Any of these can be a reason to have a hip or knee replacement evaluated:

  • Loosening, the implant works loose from the bone over time
  • Wear, the smooth bearing surface gradually wears out
  • Infection, bacteria settle on the implant, sometimes years later
  • Instability or dislocation, the joint feels unstable or slips out of place
  • Fracture around the implant, a broken bone next to the components, often after a fall
  • Stiffness or ongoing pain, a joint that never moved or felt quite right

Dr. Harris routinely uses robotic assistance or computer navigation in his hip and knee replacements. Each robotic-assisted operation is planned in advance from the patient’s own imaging, and the system helps carry that plan out precisely in the operating room. He has trained on four of the systems in current use for the knee: Mako, ROSA, CORI and VELYS. For hip replacement he uses the Mako system.

The technology is a tool rather than a different operation. Patients can do very well with a joint replacement done with robotic assistance and with one done without it. What the evidence shows consistently is more accurate implant position, without a proven difference in long-term outcomes.

On the hip side, robotic assistance and navigation are used with both the direct anterior approach and the STAR approach.

Mako is a trademark of Stryker; ROSA of Zimmer Biomet; CORI of Smith+Nephew; and VELYS of DePuy Synthes. Naming these systems does not imply endorsement by, or affiliation with, their makers. Payments from device makers to physicians, including meals, are reported publicly through CMS Open Payments.

By procedure and by location

General information for patients and clinicians, not a substitute for advice from your own surgeon.

Talk it through

If you are weighing whether surgery makes sense, or want a second opinion, you are welcome to get in touch.

Contact